From f969b7d892dc86243c93a61eb46124c105b59145 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tobias Doerffel <tobias.doerffel@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 18:53:10 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Mixer: fixed wrong macro logic leading to potential
 performance loss

The macro logic for defining the SPINLOCK_PAUSE macro tested against
LMMS_HOST_X86_64 twice instead of testing against LMMS_HOST_X86_64 and
LMMS_HOST_X86. This caused the SPINLOCK_PAUSE macro not being set on
x86.

(cherry picked from commit bf8f823751fa581cf7cbd33c7c466101d481b2f2)
---
 src/core/mixer.cpp | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/core/mixer.cpp b/src/core/mixer.cpp
index db0e0d9ed..81de100d8 100644
--- a/src/core/mixer.cpp
+++ b/src/core/mixer.cpp
@@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ void MixerWorkerThread::processJobQueue( void )
 
 // define a pause instruction for spinlock-loop - merely useful on
 // HyperThreading systems with just one physical core (e.g. Intel Atom)
-#ifdef LMMS_HOST_X86_64
+#ifdef LMMS_HOST_X86
 #define SPINLOCK_PAUSE()        asm( "pause" )
 #else
 #ifdef LMMS_HOST_X86_64