nna/npm-audit-action
3
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions 1 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

refactor(testing): migrate from Jest to Vitest for testing framework

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Naoki Oketani
2025-05-02 14:03:34 +00:00
parent a898de739e
commit 2564984eab
11 changed files with 3190 additions and 467 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

38
__tests__/main.test.ts
View File

@@ -5,17 +5,17 @@ import {run} from '../src/main'
import * as issue from '../src/issue'
import * as pr from '../src/pr'
jest.mock('../src/audit')
jest.mock('../src/issue')
jest.mock('../src/pr')
jest.mock('@octokit/rest', () => {
vi.mock('../src/audit')
vi.mock('../src/issue')
vi.mock('../src/pr')
vi.mock('@octokit/rest', () => {
return {
Octokit: jest.fn().mockImplementation(() => {
Octokit: vi.fn().mockImplementation(() => {
return {
issues: {
listForRepo: jest.fn(),
createComment: jest.fn(),
create: jest.fn()
listForRepo: vi.fn(),
createComment: vi.fn(),
create: vi.fn()
}
}
})
@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@ jest.mock('@octokit/rest', () => {
describe('run: pr', () => {
beforeEach(() => {
// initialize mock
jest.mocked(Audit).mockClear()
jest.mocked(pr).createComment.mockClear()
vi.mocked(Audit).mockClear()
vi.mocked(pr).createComment.mockClear()
process.env.INPUT_AUDIT_LEVEL = 'low'
process.env.INPUT_PRODUCTION_FLAG = 'false'
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ describe('run: pr', () => {
})
test('does not call pr.createComment if vulnerabilities are not found', () => {
jest.mocked(Audit).mockImplementation((): any => {
vi.mocked(Audit).mockImplementation((): any => {
return {
stdout: fs.readFileSync(
path.join(__dirname, 'testdata/audit/success.txt')
@@ -57,14 +57,14 @@ describe('run: pr', () => {
}
})
jest.mocked(pr).createComment.mockResolvedValue()
vi.mocked(pr).createComment.mockResolvedValue()
expect(run).not.toThrowError()
expect(pr.createComment).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
})
test('calls pr.createComment if vulnerabilities are found in PR', () => {
jest.mocked(Audit).mockImplementation((): any => {
vi.mocked(Audit).mockImplementation((): any => {
return {
stdout: fs.readFileSync(
path.join(__dirname, 'testdata/audit/error.txt')
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ describe('run: pr', () => {
}
})
jest.mocked(pr).createComment.mockResolvedValue()
vi.mocked(pr).createComment.mockResolvedValue()
expect(run).not.toThrowError()
expect(pr.createComment).toHaveBeenCalled()
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ describe('run: pr', () => {
test('does not call pr.createComment if create_pr_comments is set to false', () => {
process.env.INPUT_CREATE_PR_COMMENTS = 'false'
jest.mocked(Audit).mockImplementation((): any => {
vi.mocked(Audit).mockImplementation((): any => {
return {
stdout: fs.readFileSync(
path.join(__dirname, 'testdata/audit/error.txt')
@@ -117,8 +117,8 @@ describe('run: pr', () => {
describe('run: issue', () => {
beforeEach(() => {
// initialize mock
jest.mocked(Audit).mockClear()
jest.mocked(issue).getExistingIssueNumber.mockClear()
vi.mocked(Audit).mockClear()
vi.mocked(issue).getExistingIssueNumber.mockClear()
process.env.INPUT_AUDIT_LEVEL = 'low'
process.env.INPUT_PRODUCTION_FLAG = 'false'
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ describe('run: issue', () => {
test('does not call octokit.rest.issues.create if create_issues is set to false', () => {
process.env.INPUT_CREATE_ISSUES = 'false'
jest.mocked(Audit).mockImplementation((): any => {
vi.mocked(Audit).mockImplementation((): any => {
return {
stdout: fs.readFileSync(
path.join(__dirname, 'testdata/audit/error.txt')
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ describe('run: issue', () => {
}
})
jest.mocked(issue).getExistingIssueNumber.mockResolvedValue(null)
vi.mocked(issue).getExistingIssueNumber.mockResolvedValue(null)
expect(run).not.toThrowError()
expect(issue.getExistingIssueNumber).not.toHaveBeenCalled()