nna/npm-audit-action
3
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions 1 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

chore(package): bump jest from 27.2.5 to 29.3.1

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Naoki Oketani
2022-12-18 14:09:18 +09:00
parent da9d037b16
commit b3d30b2367
4 changed files with 1599 additions and 2496 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

23
__tests__/main.test.ts
View File

@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
import * as fs from 'fs'
import * as path from 'path'
import {Octokit} from '@octokit/rest'
import {mocked} from 'ts-jest/utils'
import {Audit} from '../src/audit'
import {run} from '../src/main'
import * as issue from '../src/issue'
@@ -14,8 +13,8 @@ jest.mock('../src/pr')
describe('run: pr', () => {
beforeEach(() => {
// initialize mock
mocked(Audit).mockClear()
mocked(pr).createComment.mockClear()
jest.mocked(Audit).mockClear()
jest.mocked(pr).createComment.mockClear()
process.env.INPUT_AUDIT_LEVEL = 'low'
process.env.INPUT_PRODUCTION_FLAG = 'false'
@@ -28,7 +27,7 @@ describe('run: pr', () => {
})
test('does not call pr.createComment if vulnerabilities are not found', () => {
mocked(Audit).mockImplementation((): any => {
jest.mocked(Audit).mockImplementation((): any => {
return {
stdout: fs.readFileSync(
path.join(__dirname, 'testdata/audit/success.txt')
@@ -46,7 +45,7 @@ describe('run: pr', () => {
}
})
mocked(pr).createComment.mockResolvedValue({
jest.mocked(pr).createComment.mockResolvedValue({
config: {},
headers: {},
status: 201,
@@ -61,7 +60,7 @@ describe('run: pr', () => {
})
test('calls pr.createComment if vulnerabilities are found in PR', () => {
mocked(Audit).mockImplementation((): any => {
jest.mocked(Audit).mockImplementation((): any => {
return {
stdout: fs.readFileSync(
path.join(__dirname, 'testdata/audit/error.txt')
@@ -79,7 +78,7 @@ describe('run: pr', () => {
}
})
mocked(pr).createComment.mockResolvedValue({
jest.mocked(pr).createComment.mockResolvedValue({
config: {},
headers: {},
status: 201,
@@ -96,7 +95,7 @@ describe('run: pr', () => {
test('does not call pr.createComment if create_pr_comments is set to false', () => {
process.env.INPUT_CREATE_PR_COMMENTS = 'false'
mocked(Audit).mockImplementation((): any => {
jest.mocked(Audit).mockImplementation((): any => {
return {
stdout: fs.readFileSync(
path.join(__dirname, 'testdata/audit/error.txt')
@@ -122,8 +121,8 @@ describe('run: pr', () => {
describe('run: issue', () => {
beforeEach(() => {
// initialize mock
mocked(Audit).mockClear()
mocked(issue).getExistingIssueNumber.mockClear()
jest.mocked(Audit).mockClear()
jest.mocked(issue).getExistingIssueNumber.mockClear()
process.env.INPUT_AUDIT_LEVEL = 'low'
process.env.INPUT_PRODUCTION_FLAG = 'false'
@@ -138,7 +137,7 @@ describe('run: issue', () => {
test('does not call octokit.rest.issues.create if create_issues is set to false', () => {
process.env.INPUT_CREATE_ISSUES = 'false'
mocked(Audit).mockImplementation((): any => {
jest.mocked(Audit).mockImplementation((): any => {
return {
stdout: fs.readFileSync(
path.join(__dirname, 'testdata/audit/error.txt')
@@ -156,7 +155,7 @@ describe('run: issue', () => {
}
})
mocked(issue).getExistingIssueNumber.mockResolvedValue(null)
jest.mocked(issue).getExistingIssueNumber.mockResolvedValue(null)
expect(run).not.toThrowError()
expect(issue.getExistingIssueNumber).not.toHaveBeenCalled()